Full disclosure: I've been a big fan of John Hawkins' Right Wing News for a long time, and I'm on his blogger-polling email list.
I know him, I like him, and this time,
I disagree with him.
Unless all four campaigns can get together and commit to a gentlemen's agreement to run positive campaigns from here on out, it's entirely possible that the winner of the primary will be so damaged that he may not be able to get the job done.
Yeah, I used to think that brutal primary fights led to weakened, damaged candidates, too.
Until 2008.
McCain had the nomination locked up in March. Then he just coasted into the convention.
Meanwhile, Hillary & Barack duked it out until June, with speculation all the way up into the actual Democrat Convention in August that Hillary might try pulling some wacky stunt to steal the nomination. Three months of mean commercials and cactus-spined soundbites. Two more months of vinegar and acrimony from bitter, jilted Hillary-followers.
I laughed a lot of smug, condescending laughs in those days, figuring they were just writing McCain's campaign ads for him.
The day after the election, I wasn't laughing any more.
I've since come to the conclusion that nothing that happens before the convention matters.
And probably nothing before October 1st.
The 24-hour news cycle has a very short memory, and even dedicated liberal news outlets can only beat a story for so long before it stops selling ads for them, forcing them to move on.
The short-attention-span, unengaged, "swing-voters" who provide the margin of victory in every election won't notice any of the mean & ugly things Newt says about Mitt & vice versa during the nomination process, because they don't start paying attention to politics until they're done passing out the Halloween candy.
So I say "GAME ON!" to the GOP - tear each other apart. At this point in the election cycle, it doesn't matter.